International Journal of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Innovations

An International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal

ISSN (Online): 3142-8665
CODEN (USA): IJCPSM
Monthly Publication

editor@ijcpi.com

International Journal of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Innovations

An International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal

ISSN (Online): 3142-8665
CODEN (USA): IJCPSM
Monthly Publication

editor@ijcpi.com

REDUCTION IN POLYPHARMACY BURDEN AMONG TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS THROUGH COMPREHENSIVE DIABETES CARE PLAN-BASED INTEGRATIVE MANAGEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADVERSE DRUG INTERACTION RISK AND HEALTH SYSTEM COST

Dr. Rohit Sane, Dr. Gurudatta Amin, Dr. Pravin Ghadigaonkar, Dr. Aniket Kamble*, Dr. Rupali Kaware
Full Article DOI

Abstract

Background: Polypharmacy — conventionally defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications — is prevalent among patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with adverse drug interactions, treatment non-adherence, and escalating healthcare costs. Integrative management programmes combining Panchakarma-based therapies, structured dietary intervention, and allopathic co-management have shown promise in glycaemic control, yet their impact on medication burden has not been systematically characterised. Objective: To quantify the reduction in allopathic antidiabetic medication burden in T2DM patients enrolled in the Comprehensive Diabetes Care (CDC) programme at Madhavbaug Integrative Clinic, Amravati, Maharashtra, and to assess associated changes in cardiometabolic parameters and post-treatment glycaemic remission. Methods: A retrospective before-after observational study was conducted on 39 T2DM patients enrolled in the Comprehensive Diabetes Care (CDC) programme at Amravati Fr clinic, Vidharbha RIC. Drug burden at enrolment and at last follow-up was quantified by counting individual allopathic agents listed per patient. Primary outcome was the proportion achieving ≥50% medication reduction or complete cessation. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (RBS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), weight, and BMI. Paired t-tests and descriptive statistics were applied. Reporting followed the STROBE checklist for observational studies. Results: Of 39 CDC-enrolled patients (mean age 51.0 ± 10.1 years; 54% male), 25 (64.1%) were on allopathic OHA at enrolment with a mean drug count of 3.24 ± 2.50 agents. Mean drug count at last follow-up decreased significantly to 2.08 ± 2.40 (paired t=3.32, p=0.0029). Complete medication cessation was achieved in 6 patients (24.0% of OHA-positive cohort), and ≥50% reduction in 12 patients (48.0%). Polypharmacy (five or more drugs) was present in 5 patients at baseline and reduced to 2 at follow-up. HbA1c declined significantly from 9.09 ± 3.6% to 7.87 ± 2.7% (p=0.0040; Cohen's d=0.56). SBP reduced from 124.2 to 119.1 mmHg (p=0.013), weight from 68.9 to 66.5 kg (p<0.001), and BMI from 26.1 to 25.2 kg/m² (p<0.001). Four patients (10.3% of total cohort) achieved post-treatment glucose tolerance test (GTT) negativity, consistent with programme-associated glycaemic remission. Conclusion: The CDC programme was associated with significant reduction in allopathic medication burden alongside clinically meaningful cardiometabolic improvement. These findings suggest that structured integrative diabetes management may offer a viable deprescription pathway, with implications for adverse drug interaction risk reduction and out-of-pocket healthcare cost. Multi-site, prospective replication with standardised follow-up is warranted.

References

  • Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019; 157: 107843. [Updated for India: IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th Ed, 2021; India estimate 101 million: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2023; 11(5): 306-316.]
  • Iglay K, Hannachi H, Howie PJ, et al. Prevalence and co-prevalence of comorbidities among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin., 2016; 32(7): 1243-1252.
  • Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr, 2017; 17(1): 230.
  • Morin L, Johnell K, Laroche ML, Fastbom J, Wastesson JW. The epidemiology of polypharmacy in older adults: register-based prospective cohort study. Clin Epidemiol, 2018; 10: 289-298.
  • Fried TR, O'Leary J, Towle V, Goldstein MK, Trentalange M, Martin DK. Health outcomes associated with polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc., 2014; 62(12): 2261-2272.
  • Tharkar S, Devarajan A, Kumpatla S, Viswanathan V. The socioeconomics of diabetes from a developing country perspective: a population based cost of illness study. Prim Care Diabetes, 2010; 4(3): 189-196.
  • American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Standards of Care in Diabetes — 2024. Diabetes Care., 2024; 47(Suppl 1):           S1-S321.
  • Thio SL, Nam J, van Driel ML, Zwar NA, Davis SR. Effects of deprescribing interventions on mortality and hospitalisation in people with type 2 diabetes taking antidiabetic drugs: a systematic review. BMJ Open., 2019; 9(1): e022793.
  • Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, et al. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med., 2015; 175(5): 827-834.
  • [Reference for prior Madhavbaug multi-site glycaemic outcomes study — insert your published or in-press citation here].
  • [Reference for Pratap Nagar / Medical Square Panchakarma dose-response paper — insert here].
  • [Reference for Medical Square Nagpur dose-response paper (Spearman ρ=0.616) — insert here].
  • Riddle MC, Cefalu WT, Evans PH, et al. Consensus report: definition and interpretation of remission in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care., 2021; 44(10):    2438-2444.
  • Basu S, Andrews J, Kishore S, Panjabi R, Stuckler D. Comparative performance of private and public healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS Med., 2012; 9(6): e1001244.
  • Lean MEJ, Leslie WS, Barnes AC, et al. Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet, 2018; 391(10120):           541-551.
  • Tiwari P, Ahmad K, Baig MH. Gymnema sylvestre for diabetes: from traditional herb to future's therapeutic. Curr Pharm Des., 2017; 23(11):            1667-1676.
  • Yin J, Xing H, Ye J. Efficacy of berberine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism, 2008; 57(5): 712-717.
  • Narahari SR, Ryan TJ, Aggithaya MG, Bose KS, Prasanna KS. Evidence-based approaches for the Ayurvedic traditional herbal formulations: towards an integrative approach. J Altern Complement Med., 2008; 14(6): 769-776.

QR

QR Code

Citation

Dr. Rohit Sane1, Dr. Gurudatta Amin2, Dr. Pravin Ghadigaonkar3, Dr. Aniket Kamble*4, Dr. Rupali Kaware5. (2026). Reduction In Polypharmacy Burden Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Through Comprehensive Diabetes Care Plan-Based Integrative Management: Implications For Adverse Drug Interaction Risk And Health System Cost. International Journal of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Innovations, 1(3), 99-106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20581799

Copyright © Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)

Keywords

polypharmacy, deprescription, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Panchakarma, integrative medicine, Comprehensive Diabetes Care, medication burden, glycaemic remission, adverse drug interactions, India.